We examined the Dickson Lake watershed in Algonquin Park using the Deterministic 8-Direction and Multiple Flow Direction TI models to determine the level of protection afforded to sub-watersheds under different hypothetical protection scenarios. This work is a scoping exercise in sub-watershed protection only. It does not reflect current or projected forest management practices in Algonquin Park for this watershed.
Maps Generated by the Hypothetical Protection Scenarios

Protection Under The Current Guidelines

The current guidelines for fish habitat protection involve buffering “mapped” hydrographic features (lake shorelines, marshes & streams). The term “mapped” refers to all features currently maintained in the Natural Resources & Values Information System. Protection by the buffers is based on the adjacent hillslope gradient, inland from a lake shoreline, marsh or stream to a maximum of 90m in steep terrain. The Forest Fish project has developed an automated method for the rapid delineation and assessment of slope-based buffer zones.
Using this method the amount of land protected around the shoreline of Dickson Lake would be:
Using this method the number of YOY brook trout habitats protected would be:

Protection using D8 Habitat Site Identification and Full Upslope Contributing Areas

Using an “Upper 10% of the Shoreline” Topographic Index approach, based on the Deterministic 8-Direction (D8) algorithm, full catchment protection was calculated
Using this method the amount of land protected around the shoreline of Dickson Lake would be:
Using this method the number of YOY brook trout habitats protected would be:
Using this method 1 of 10 YOY brook trout habitats would be offered no protection

Protection using MFD Habitat Site Identification and Full Upslope Contributing Areas

Using an “Upper 10% of the Shoreline” Topographic Index approach, based on the Multiple Flow Direction (MFD) algorithm, full catchment protection was calculated
Using this method the amount of land protected around the shoreline of Dickson Lake would be:
Using this method the number of YOY brook trout habitats protected would be:
Using this method 2 of 10 YOY brook trout habitats would be offered no protection

Protection using D8 Habitat Site Identification and 90m Buffering Around Sites

Using an “Upper 10% of the Shoreline” Topographic Index approach, based on the Deterministic 8-Direction (D8) algorithm, 90m buffer around TI identified sites was calculated
Using this method the amount of land protected around the shoreline of Dickson Lake would be:
Using this method the number of YOY brook trout habitats protected would be:
Using this method 1 of 10 YOY brook trout habitats would be offered no protection

Protection using MFD Habitat Site Identification and 120m Buffering Around Sites

Using an “Upper 10% of the Shoreline” Topographic Index approach, based on the Multiple Flow Direction (MFD) algorithm, 120m buffer around TI identified sites was calculated
Using this method the amount of land protected around the shoreline of Dickson Lake would be:
Using this method the number of YOY brook trout habitats protected would be:
Using this method 2 of 10 YOY brook trout habitats would be offered no protection